Comments for The Resonance Project Foundation http://theresonanceproject.org Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:58:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 Comment on The Schwarzschild Proton Paper at the American Institute of Physics by Susan http://theresonanceproject.org/the-schwarzschild-proton-paper-at-the-american-institute-of-physics/comment-page-1#comment-1637 Susan Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:58:59 +0000 http://theresonanceproject.org/blog/?p=179#comment-1637 Dear Nassim, I am not a scientist, I am an artist. For the longest time I have been searching for a way to learn how to draw, explore, and investigate sacred geometry in a deeper way. This morning I asked the universe to lead me to a teacher. Later I found myself watching a Barbara Hand Clow video and noticed a link to one of your videos -- Sacred Geometry and Unified Fields. As I listened to your talk, I immediately realized that my request was answered. But I cannot afford to purchase all your DVDs nor do I know if they contain the info I need to learn from an artist's perspective. Can you send me some advice? Thank you, Susan in Maine Dear Nassim,
I am not a scientist, I am an artist. For the longest time I have been searching for a way to learn how to draw, explore, and investigate sacred geometry in a deeper way. This morning I asked the universe to lead me to a teacher. Later I found myself watching a Barbara Hand Clow video and noticed a link to one of your videos — Sacred Geometry and Unified Fields. As I listened to your talk, I immediately realized that my request was answered. But I cannot afford to purchase all your DVDs nor do I know if they contain the info I need to learn from an artist’s perspective. Can you send me some advice?

Thank you,
Susan in Maine

]]> Comment on The Schwarzschild Proton Paper at the American Institute of Physics by Nathaniel Gibson http://theresonanceproject.org/the-schwarzschild-proton-paper-at-the-american-institute-of-physics/comment-page-1#comment-1622 Nathaniel Gibson Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:34:11 +0000 http://theresonanceproject.org/blog/?p=179#comment-1622 @Schnookdaddy I am no physicist, but i do have great comprehension skills. From what I got from Nassim's explanation, I think that the reason that we don't see larger black holes is because of the order of scaling that he talks about. For instance, if space (inside and outside space) is comprised of sub-protonic black holes, then the large black holes we are seeing at the center of galaxies would only be like the hole in the inside of a gigantic proton, thus the next order of size up would be a mega-massive black hole at the center of the universe. I'm pretty sure we haven't been able to see anything like that with our current technology. Also, from what I understood... this perfectly balanced shape that nassim found represents the equilibrium caused by the structure of space itself. Also, you must explain to people that black holes don't function exactly like we have been taught to think (in movies and in older science books)... they don't just suck things into the singularity, but actually spit out new stars, new matter... they create as well. That for me was a big breakthrough right there. @Schnookdaddy I am no physicist, but i do have great comprehension skills. From what I got from Nassim’s explanation, I think that the reason that we don’t see larger black holes is because of the order of scaling that he talks about. For instance, if space (inside and outside space) is comprised of sub-protonic black holes, then the large black holes we are seeing at the center of galaxies would only be like the hole in the inside of a gigantic proton, thus the next order of size up would be a mega-massive black hole at the center of the universe. I’m pretty sure we haven’t been able to see anything like that with our current technology.

Also, from what I understood… this perfectly balanced shape that nassim found represents the equilibrium caused by the structure of space itself. Also, you must explain to people that black holes don’t function exactly like we have been taught to think (in movies and in older science books)… they don’t just suck things into the singularity, but actually spit out new stars, new matter… they create as well. That for me was a big breakthrough right there.

]]> Comment on The Schwarzschild Proton Manifesto by Barney Bass http://theresonanceproject.org/the-schwarzschild-proton-manifesto/comment-page-1#comment-1596 Barney Bass Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:35:15 +0000 http://theresonanceproject.org/blog/?p=160#comment-1596 To Whom It May Concern @ RP.org I have an ituitive understanding of vortex torsion. I would like to address the speed of light. It must vary because in order for light to manifest an electron must shed energy. Therefore light is pulsing at trillions of cps (time forward, time reverse). Equally right spin, left spin. In other words the atomic torsion ring is wave transition at least 2x2x386,000mps. What would be the fourier transform to come up with an answer to the varible speed of light. Sorry I'm no mathematician. In other words.......How fast is the universe breathing, or refreshing, and does it matter after all? To Whom It May Concern @ RP.org

I have an ituitive understanding of vortex torsion. I would like to address the speed of light. It must vary because in order for light to manifest an electron must shed energy. Therefore light is pulsing at trillions of cps (time forward, time reverse). Equally right spin, left spin. In other words the atomic torsion ring is wave transition at least 2x2x386,000mps. What would be the fourier transform to come up with an answer to the varible speed of light. Sorry I’m no mathematician. In other words…….How fast is the universe breathing, or refreshing, and does it matter after all?

]]> Comment on Letter to Dr. Bob-a-thon by edison Thomas http://theresonanceproject.org/letter-to-dr-bob-a-thon/comment-page-1#comment-1591 edison Thomas Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:15:37 +0000 http://theresonanceproject.org/blog/?p=153#comment-1591 Having read about 99.999999% of the previous posts, I see that this open letter to a "bob-a-thon" guy has become more of a forum for the reader to postulate ones own theories/ideas concerning the secrets of the 'universe'. So...Ah, but first. How rude of me. Nassim, my warmest congradulations on pissing off so many stuffed windbags. Or should I say inflated vacuum bags. Your ideas, though not entirely original(as you admit/demonstrate)are presented in a most enjoyable and relatively(pun)easy -for-the-layman(me)format. Your presentations not only reveal that you know your math, but even more importantly, that you grok what you are talking about. To paraphrase Shakespeare, to grok or not to grok; that is the key, not the question. I can only speak from the prespective of my own black hole, but I have found, from the many trips outside of my 'normal' event horizon, the space/vacuum you speak of, which has in the past been refered to as the aether, is not only as dense as you postulate, but this aether is(and everything else for that matter)conscious. I am saying the universe is conscious(ness). Our brain is not only the most marvelous computer, but is also a radio, able to tune into different frequencies, enabling one to listen/see outside of the 'normal' event horizon. But you already know/grok that. I thought I'd throw that in for the benefit of others and to assure you that you are not alone in the 'big' universe. From reading the other posts here, I get the impression that some people aren't getting your main points. For instance, the bit on the scaling graph. You have put the us(the observer)at the center. How can it possibly be otherwise?DUH! Or should I say DOH!(apologies, Homer) This math shows/proves so much. If the universe is expanding out to infinity in all directions, then it follows that whether I am on the Earth or on Mars, I am the center of that universe . And to carry that idea to the next logical step...if it is true for me and you at the same moment, and I am on Mars and you are on the Earth, well it's just 'dot' simple. Having read about 99.999999% of the previous posts, I see that this open letter to a “bob-a-thon” guy has become more of a forum for the reader to postulate ones own theories/ideas concerning the secrets of the ‘universe’.
So…Ah, but first. How rude of me. Nassim, my warmest congradulations on pissing off so many stuffed windbags. Or should I say inflated vacuum bags. Your ideas, though not entirely original(as you admit/demonstrate)are presented in a most enjoyable and relatively(pun)easy -for-the-layman(me)format. Your presentations not only reveal that you know your math, but even more importantly, that you grok what you are talking about.
To paraphrase Shakespeare, to grok or not to grok; that is the key, not the question.
I can only speak from the prespective of my own black hole, but I have found, from the many trips outside of my ‘normal’ event horizon, the space/vacuum you speak of, which has in the past been refered to as the aether, is not only as dense as you postulate, but this aether is(and everything else for that matter)conscious. I am saying the universe is conscious(ness).
Our brain is not only the most marvelous computer, but is also a radio, able to tune into different frequencies, enabling one to listen/see outside of the ‘normal’ event horizon. But you already know/grok that. I thought I’d throw that in for the benefit of others and to assure you that you are not alone in the ‘big’ universe.
From reading the other posts here, I get the impression that some people aren’t getting your main points. For instance, the bit on the scaling graph. You have put the us(the observer)at the center. How can it possibly be otherwise?DUH! Or should I say DOH!(apologies, Homer) This math shows/proves so much.
If the universe is expanding out to infinity in all directions, then it follows that whether I am on the Earth or on Mars, I am the center of that universe . And to carry that idea to the next logical step…if it is true for me and you at the same moment, and I am on Mars and you are on the Earth, well it’s just ‘dot’ simple.

]]> Comment on The Schwarzschild Proton Paper at the American Institute of Physics by Edison Thomas http://theresonanceproject.org/the-schwarzschild-proton-paper-at-the-american-institute-of-physics/comment-page-1#comment-1578 Edison Thomas Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:25:31 +0000 http://theresonanceproject.org/blog/?p=179#comment-1578 I now say "It's just dot simple" when trying to explain something to someone. Also, I am once again having what I call "LS-crazy" flashbacks. Good ones though. I must meditate more; my brain hurts and it won't be quiet. Thanks a lot, Nassim! HA! I now say “It’s just dot simple” when trying to explain something to someone. Also, I am once again having what I call “LS-crazy” flashbacks. Good ones though. I must meditate more; my brain hurts and it won’t be quiet. Thanks a lot, Nassim! HA!

]]> Comment on Join The Resonance Project, Become a Member and Make a Difference! by Vivek Dey http://theresonanceproject.org/join-the-resonance-project-become-a-member-and-make-a-difference/comment-page-1#comment-1522 Vivek Dey Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:08:26 +0000 http://theresonanceproject.org/blog/?p=169#comment-1522 I am an accountant by profession ,I have not taken any formal education of physics yet teachings of Nassim Heramein influence me a lot. I wish to see Nassim ,Gregg Braden,Fred Allen Wolf togather with Eckhart Tolle. I am an accountant by profession ,I have not taken any formal education of physics yet teachings of Nassim Heramein influence me a lot. I wish to see Nassim ,Gregg Braden,Fred Allen Wolf togather with Eckhart Tolle.

]]> Comment on Gravitational Detector May Give a First Glimpse of the Holographic Universe by Oscar http://theresonanceproject.org/gravitational-detector-may-give-a-first-glimpse-of-the-holographic-universe/comment-page-1#comment-1482 Oscar Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:12:08 +0000 http://theresonanceproject.org/blog/?p=56#comment-1482 Mr. Nassim, you are a truly gifted individual and everyone sharing the passion gain enlightment are as well. I'm no scholar by any mean but just watching the movie contact just brought me to tears, and especially after watching you DVD's. I am a Freemason and the sacred geometry which we all in this universe is seek to unfold is near. The idea over the vacuum is brilliant and it I believe sheds immense light on the concepts what goes up must come down and what comes around goes around. In your video, Nassim , of the crop circle of the ET being's image and the decoding of the message sent by them. The ET stated "There is still time" Could they have meant that in the literal sense as in There is STILL TIME. As in unmoving time? You stated that in order for something to be in motion it has to at some point be still. Brilliant! All of our never ending questions has the answers to them right here on earth in the most simple of forms. As above so below- Lon Milo Duquette. But be ware that it can be very dangerous to have that type of knowledge at your disposal. I love all you guys and gals. See ya in the next Galaxy! Mr. Nassim,
you are a truly gifted individual and everyone sharing the passion gain enlightment are as well. I’m no scholar by any mean but just watching the movie contact just brought me to tears, and especially after watching you DVD’s. I am a Freemason and the sacred geometry which we all in this universe is seek to unfold is near. The idea over the vacuum is brilliant and it I believe sheds immense light on the concepts what goes up must come down and what comes around goes around. In your video, Nassim , of the crop circle of the ET being’s image and the decoding of the message sent by them. The ET stated “There is still time” Could they have meant that in the literal sense as in There is STILL TIME. As in unmoving time? You stated that in order for something to be in motion it has to at some point be still. Brilliant! All of our never ending questions has the answers to them right here on earth in the most simple of forms. As above so below- Lon Milo Duquette. But be ware that it can be very dangerous to have that type of knowledge at your disposal. I love all you guys and gals. See ya in the next Galaxy!

]]> Comment on Letter to Dr. Bob-a-thon by Alejandro L. de la Barra http://theresonanceproject.org/letter-to-dr-bob-a-thon/comment-page-1#comment-1469 Alejandro L. de la Barra Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:32:12 +0000 http://theresonanceproject.org/blog/?p=153#comment-1469 Dears Nassim and Elizabeth: I am not a physician but a Mechanical Engineer and I found your job very serious, and also want to remark that bobathon still hasn´t understood the nature of physics. He says: “by quoting a vacuum energy density as if it has a physical significance”. Lets suppose we have got a capacitor, and that this capacitor has two sheets of metal, and that there is vacuum between the two sheets. You can calculate the energy per volume from the vacuum in a capacitor from: Energy=(epsilon0*E^2)/2 ; where epsilon0 is the dielectric constant of the vacuum and E is the Electric Field. He has confounded the vacuum with the “nothingness”. Is there an energy between the two sheets?: There should be a mass too!!! Regards: Alejandro L. de la Barra. Dears Nassim and Elizabeth:
I am not a physician but a Mechanical Engineer and I found your job very serious, and also want to remark that bobathon still hasn´t understood the nature of physics.
He says: “by quoting a vacuum energy density as if it has a physical significance”.

Lets suppose we have got a capacitor, and that this capacitor has two sheets of metal, and that there is vacuum between the two sheets. You can calculate the energy per volume from the vacuum in a capacitor from:

Energy=(epsilon0*E^2)/2 ; where epsilon0 is the dielectric constant of the vacuum and E is the Electric Field.

He has confounded the vacuum with the “nothingness”.

Is there an energy between the two sheets?: There should be a mass too!!!

Regards:

Alejandro L. de la Barra.

]]> Comment on Letter to Dr. Bob-a-thon by Jeff http://theresonanceproject.org/letter-to-dr-bob-a-thon/comment-page-1#comment-1468 Jeff Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:43:13 +0000 http://theresonanceproject.org/blog/?p=153#comment-1468 Hello again. I don't know that it matters but the identity of "Bob" was revealed on his blog by a person who didn't appreciate his ranting and mean spirited criticism of Nassim. He was told that if he erased the comment then he might find HIS name all over the internet. I don't beleive in revenge but I do beleive in karma. Maybe Bob's employer might not be so happy if they knew the unprofessional and unscientifical language's he continues to use under the cowardly guise of annonimity. It's troubling to me that "bob" is a molder of future physicist's and that his rhetoric can be so spiteful and childish yet he can hold a teaching position at a school in England. Maybe this post will convince Robert Dickerson who teaches A-Level Physics at a University and is supposedly friends with Prof. Brian Cox, will learn to engauge in professional, scientific debates without resorting to calling someone a "fraud" and putting so much energy into trashing someone across the internet while hiding and not having to be held accountable for his remarks. I'm not a scientist but one thing I know to be true in physics is that "for every action, there is an equal and opposite re-action". Now let's put (him) this behind us so we can move forward with respectful, factual debates which is the basis for scientific discovery. He has since removed the revealing post but we know who you are Robert. Now knock it off. The world has enough cowards. Thanks again Nassim. Karma. Hello again. I don’t know that it matters but the identity of “Bob” was revealed on his blog by a person who didn’t appreciate his ranting and mean spirited criticism of Nassim. He was told that if he erased the comment then he might find HIS name all over the internet. I don’t beleive in revenge but I do beleive in karma. Maybe Bob’s employer might not be so happy if they knew the unprofessional and unscientifical language’s he continues to use under the cowardly guise of annonimity. It’s troubling to me that “bob” is a molder of future physicist’s and that his rhetoric can be so spiteful and childish yet he can hold a teaching position at a school in England. Maybe this post will convince Robert Dickerson who teaches A-Level Physics at a University and is supposedly friends with Prof. Brian Cox, will learn to engauge in professional, scientific debates without resorting to calling someone a “fraud” and putting so much energy into trashing someone across the internet while hiding and not having to be held accountable for his remarks. I’m not a scientist but one thing I know to be true in physics is that “for every action, there is an equal and opposite re-action”. Now let’s put (him) this behind us so we can move forward with respectful, factual debates which is the basis for scientific discovery. He has since removed the revealing post but we know who you are Robert. Now knock it off. The world has enough cowards. Thanks again Nassim. Karma.

]]> Comment on Join The Resonance Project, Become a Member and Make a Difference! by Karen - Calgary, Alberta http://theresonanceproject.org/join-the-resonance-project-become-a-member-and-make-a-difference/comment-page-1#comment-1441 Karen - Calgary, Alberta Sat, 07 Jan 2012 20:00:55 +0000 http://theresonanceproject.org/blog/?p=169#comment-1441 Love Nassim and how he presents his work. Also, a physicist with a sense of humour! I would love to take his presentation to a lower level to teach others that are not scientists. Not being one myself, we all need to know this! I would volunteer my time to help spread his work. Awesome Love Nassim and how he presents his work. Also, a physicist with a sense of humour!
I would love to take his presentation to a lower level to teach others that are not scientists. Not being one myself, we all need to know this! I would volunteer my time to help spread his work.
Awesome

]]>