In his continuation of his critique, “Bob-a-thon” produces a fairly extensive analysis of my most recent paper, The Schwarzschild Proton. I have posted a response here http://theresonanceproject.org/schwarzschild-proton-manifesto and again, I stress the importance of reading this in full and investigating all included links.
At the end of the day, it will come to pass that it is understood that our universe is indeed constructed by embedded singularities from the macro scale to the micro scale. This is a difficult transition from our current understanding and it is to be expected that a certain amount of resistance would arise.
Thank you,
Nassim Haramein
Director of Research
The Resonance Project Foundation
The grace and patience of Nassim Haramein sets a high standard for all professionals whose work has entered the public forum of our time. During one of his recent conference calls in which I was blessed to participate, I was amazed and inspired by his goodwill towards and tolerance of some callers who were (in my view, at least) rather challenging to communicate with. Nassim has managed to avoid succumbing to “the cult of personality” which so often plagues people of his genius and charisma once they reach a certain level of fame — and this is a major testament to his authenticity. Nassim’s tireless dedication to sharing with us this tremendously important body of knowledge — one which has the potential and the power to transform our world — is above reproach and deserving of all appreciation and gratitude.
I want to thank you for all the effort you put in your work, and I’m so inspired by you and everything makes sense, and for average people like myself, where other scientists are almost impossible to. Keep on doing this wonderful job.I want to ask you for a permission to post many of your research and videos in my blog, translated in Spanish so other people snow of you work in other countries.Thank you…
WONDER-FULL !!I LOVE HARAMEIN, BECAUSE HE’S BRASH + FEAR-LESS, AND DARES TO QUESTION THE STANDARD MODEL …FORTUNATE-LY, OTHER PHYSICISTS HAVE ALSO DONE SO …FORE-MOST AMONG THESE, IN MY OPINION, ISERNEST STERNGLASS, AGE 86, AUTHOR OF A BOOK”BEFORE THE BIG BANG” … HAVE ANY OF YOU READ IT ??SINCERE-LY,MARK “TRUTH-SEEKER” CREEK-WATER DORAZIOBERKELEY-CALIFORNIA-USA
I wasn’t sure where to put this, but I was starting a journey of my own to find the answers i’d wanted all my life..then i found Nassim’s video’s on google and found he had already done the research for me. what a relief , and thank you.. I just wanted to draw attention to a news story i saw about Nigerian couple having a blonde blue eyed baby girl with no reason given yet. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20011175-10391704.html this would def. go along with the claims of blonde, blue eyed people across Africa long enough ago that both families have no knowledge of any race mixing in their history. anyways i saw the story at the same time Nassim was discussing it in a movie i was watching so i found it relevant.
a key to universe ASCENTION MECHANICSi woul like to addres this straight to nassim and i’m would like to know your opinion about this : http://projectcamelotproductions.com/interviews/ashayana_deane/ashayana_deane.html
man you have a brain out of this world I am totally surprised and shocked by your theories have never thought that the geometry is so ubiquitous in the structures of surrounding us world admire you and your knowledge greetings from Poland sorry for my bad english i use translator ;p
Is nos avaiable in spanish??? pleaseeee!!!
Sorry I don’t understand… but I like so much this blog and Nassim conferences
I watched Nassim’s brilliant conference a couple of times. I was just amazed with his theory.Then, I found these 3 videos from Ashayana Deane in the Camelot Project site.http://projectcamelotproductions.com/interviews/ashayana_deane/ashayana_deane.htmlI first thought both informations were complementary. Nassim is giving the basic concepts for understanding Ashayana’s explanations, but then I noticed that A. Deane refers to the Merkaba and the tree of life as being modified/altered for dark purposes. She sais there are pieces of information that are true but mixed with altered information as part of a big cosmic “plan” to make the Earth and the solar system fall in a “black hole”.My question is if Nassim, have you seen this information? if so, what do you think about it?I hope you can answer my questions. Thanks
Every black hole may hold a hidden universehttp://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727703.000-every-black-hole-may-hold-a-hidden-universe.html”… Nikodem Poplawski of Indiana University in Bloomington showed that inside each black hole there could exist another universe (Physics Letters B, DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.029…”They are saying this in 2010, at least 6 years after Nassim Haramein did it.
Ever since I discovered Nassim’s work in January 2010 (watching the two 4-hour videos from 2003 on YouTube), it really made sense to me and connected many pieces of truths that I had already discovered for myself. I don’t necessarily comprehend all the details of the equations, but I do understand the concepts & physics as a whole. I have never had such a strong reaction to information as I have had to this. It’s like deep inside me, I *KNOW* that Nassim is correct and he has discovered something simply amazing!! There is more to existence than just externally verifiable things. There is an internal, invisible side to the universe that is just as real as the external, visible things. I think how we FEEL about something needs to play a role in our truth finding just as much as an objective study of the external, material world should.It’s funny to me that Bob-a-thon tries to discredit Nassim’s work with what appears to be a very superficial understanding of it. He seems to take certain currently accepted scientific understandings as absolute fact that have no unknowns to them. When in fact, current science cannot even explain something as seemingly basic as where does the everything get the energy to keep spinning indefinitely? He claims Nassim has no understanding of physics, but after reading through Nassim’s second response and seeing the detail he goes into in responding to Bob-a-thon I can tell that Nassim does indeed understand physics. If his work had no basis in reality, I don’t think it would have lasted this long, or received the response that it has.We humans fear the unknown and cling to familiarity to make us feel better, but we need to be brave enough to venture out in the unknown and be willing to accept new possibilities if we want to move forward to a better understanding of the universe we live in. Clearly, the current accepted view of the universe can only explain so much. There is so much that it cannot explain. It seems like one of the mistakes has been that every time scientists come across “infinity”, they dismiss it and try to get rid of it because they think it indicates that there is some error in the equations. But Nassim’s work shows that maybe instead of trying to get rid of the infinities, we should instead try to figure out WHY infinity keeps popping up and what it means. We need to be willing to continually change/update our concepts with new info rather than forcing the old ways to fit what we want the truth to be.I could go on and on as this type of thing is a passion of mine, but I’ll stop myself here. I wish there was a way I could talk with Nassim personally, over email at least. I know I’m only one of TONS of people who want the same thing but if he could respond to me personally via the email I provided in the “Mail” section, I would be eternally grateful.
Hello! Einstein’s dream was to find out a unique theory of the Universe! I found it! “ENERGY & ALGORITHM & ENERGY” is the God of us all in the Universe ! – for those of you who are more religious! For all, please note this: Octavian Brichis’s postulate: “Everything in the Universe is Energy & Algorithm & Equilibrium!”
There will always be a conclusion to make. One can make it from the point of view that knowledge is finite and you can make it from the the point of view that knowledge is infinite. You decide what way to go by case to case basis, no one else can.Which of these approaches one use to to reach a conclusion can alter ones conclusion in the same amount as the difference is between these point of views.One can add that knowledge has been proven time and time again to be flexible in it’s once absolute “truth” so that is something to take into account.Nassim to me speaks to mind over science, why is that? Maybe because current science is not where Nassim is going?To use a Wayne Gretsky (hockey legend) saying… I skate to where the puck is going, not to where it is.Nassim, if you read this. Hope is that someone unveil something that can put an end to the buildup of energy and resource wars that are certain to come absent a revolution in energy technology that will be made available to all mankind.Also, any more on the “field” Contacts made wayback? It needs some attention to.An update?
nassim,you have sparked a chord with me . . . and with many people i’m sure!i have had a stroke and i have learned, again, my words. it has taken me 7 years, actually, 7 years this wednesday. i know this is weird, but can i speak with you?ann
Good day;I was stupefied learning the Unified Fields Theory!For years I knew for sure 15 bilion years is much too young for the universe (3 times the Earth’s evolution), and I knew there is some kind of process for “renewing” its core matter (similar to that for tectonic plates). The macrocosm acting as a Self-Maintaining Polarized Singularity (“black-hole”) feeding itself back over and over does present the dynamics I suspected to be inherent.I can not thank you enough for having brought that into public knowledge! It is breakthrough like this that are leading to greater understanding. What a pitty the establishments are taking so long to adapt.On the other hand, since the Electric Theory describes the electromagnetic skeleton to the universe (matter/ambiplasma) and related dynamics, I really need an input to figure out how both spheres of descriptions (Unified Fields and Electric theories) intertwines together.Looking forward.DataJY.
Way to F some Bob-a-thon butts!!! Best of luck with the “mediocrities/ status quo” in the scientific community.I am no expert (apparently nobody is) but your observations and interpretation of experimentation are none less then genius IMO. Your ability to convey some of the most complex ideas /systems into common language really sets you apart and hopefully one day you will be recognized internationally.
As complicated as the subject is, Nassim does an excellent job of trying to bring the subject to people who are not lifelong students of mathematics and physics. Even though i do not fully understand everything Nassim speaks of, information seems to click with me. The points that strike me the most are everything projects infinity. Infinitely big and infinitely small. Also that the vacuum of space is full not empty. Try to, everyday, imagine what you are looking at is infinite in both directions. It really changes your perspective of things. Also, i beleve space is something that is false. All space is occupied by something. Think of the way we hear sound. Vibrations move the molecules in the air and we hear. That means the space around us is full not empty. We merely occupy some space shifting the molecules in that area. This my uneducated response.
Nassim, I am sure many people would like to talk to you in person, I am not different
. I just want to say thank you, you showed truth to people, and now you will have to be patient, and wait for the nobel prize or… I guess they should come up with something BIGGER especially for you. I do not think it is necessary to talk/fight with people like bob-a-thon.I wonder if it is possible to observe/measure a mass of a proton, (an actual proton), isn’t it that infinite angular velocity of a spinning particle like proton makes it impossible? Isn’t that true that you can only find it by calculating? like you can’t actually measure mass of a black hole (central sun), you can do calculations but still have no instruments to actually measure it?be well
You are doing pioneer work Nassim. I read Bobathons tirade. Some one posted it as professional proof against you on PhysOrg.com, after I commented on my interest in your research. I felt it was only right to post a link to your response to Mr. Bobathon, so people might have the chance to read it. Keep up the great work Nassim.~Wynne~~_~
You have opened my eyes to new possibilities – new horizons and new conclusions. I want to become a physicist just to prove you RIGHT. Please keep teaching us.
Dear Nassim,in one of your conferences You told something about applications of your Theory on Psychology and a book about that. As a psychologist I’m really very, very intrested. Where can I get more information? I’m working with electromagnetic fields and their influence on brain frequencies, but I’m still missing so much knowledge. Another question is about your meditation method. Is it similar to Kriya-technics and Kundalini awakening? Best wishes from Spain. Thank you for being there. Susan
Do you remember the Pioneer 10? It is a spacecraft that left the solar system in 1983. Well, scientists realized that the probe is being pushed back into our system, by some mysterious force.At first, astronomers thought that the probe was returning because of the boost from a surplus of gas in the Pioneer’s engines was the escaping cause. But the force is nearly constant. Other possibilities such as solar radiation and gravity were also discarded.The mysterious force is 10 million times stronger than gravity, and scientists are believing that this could be a “new force of nature”, currently unknown… Lol …The speed of the probe, which is currently 43,000 km per hour and seems to be waning 9 km per hour in each century.”Pioneer” is making scientists question the knowledge we have about gravity and the universe…source: hyperscience.com
correcting source address: http://hypescience.com/forca-misteriosa-esta-trazendo-uma-sonda-de-volta-ao-sistema-solar/
Nassim, in your paper about the Schwarzschild proton you quote a number for the energy density of the vacuum. This number does not match any known observations – in fact cosmological observations suggest it is many many orders of magnitude smaller.Given this, the rest of your calculations fall apart. How do you reconcile your number with the observations?
I was one of the blessed attendants to the Nassim seminar in Barcelona, last September.I am very proud to paste the following paragraphs, reflecting the perception from one of my friends, who were sat by me, over the more than 8 hours of delightful talk.Her name appears at the end. I hope you will enjoy.There is a new Physics, leaded by Nassim Haramein and his unified theory dealing with unity, full vacuum, singularity, space as an organizing agent, the world manifested as a dynamics of vacuum… with the perfect balance between forces, the expansion-contraction of the whole universe…It is amazing to hear from the science of Physics what are such deep personal experiences. Everyone who gets in touch with its own deepness knows what creative emptiness is, as well as expansion-contraction as the dynamics of life, and knows that every single thing begins and ends in the deepness, in the space, in the vacuum, from where it takes its form and where it loses it.Up to now, science seemed to have a very concrete space within the realm of the mind, and what pertains to the scientific study can be easily separated from what pertains to the personal experience of the scientist. However, this new vision brings forward a totally revolutionary concept, that is: maybe a deep understanding of Physics cannot be achieved unless the own depth had been already experienced.It is not that the world, the universe, is something, which is out there to be studied; it is that when we study something, we are the universe discovering itself.It is important to realize that Physics is part of our everyday life, as the way we understand the world, conditions how we relate to it, and when a society accepts a model for the universe, all its structures a reflection of it. Therefore, if this vision of the world is expanding, our own society will be also a reflection of it, and we have to say that this Physics deals with a source of infinite energy, a unity of all that exists…Can you imagine the moment when this model of the universe in which we live is accepted? In my opinion this moment is not a long way off, since this knowledge comes to light right now because there is a large social mass somehow already embracing this model.We are immersed in an enormous transformation. The more conscious and more open we are, the easier the transition will be.Time comes to open the eyes, to look into ourselves, to pay attention to our intuitions, to do not be afraid of discovering a universe full of possibilities…it is time to get open to the unity…Matilde de Torres
Quote from the last post:”It is not that the world, the universe, is something, which is out there to be studied; it is that when we study something, we are the universe discovering itself.”Therefore it is necessary to draw your attention to the fundamental class-antagonism patients-class vs doctors-class.. . . specified illness to create the human species or medical specialists to destroy it for all times (die MenschenGATTUNG gegen deren Zerstörungs- und EndlösungsKLASSE), that’s the class antagonism of nowadays and the only real problem to be solved.full text:http://www.spkpfh.de/Iatroimperialism.html
I have contacted Nassim in the past, and know that generally his first question is what accreditation, research papers and affiliations do you have. Thus Nassim does not really go for “wacky ideas” (which is the same for many theoretical scientists), but is open to genuine contributions to the group enterprise.
Reading Bob’s blog and reading Nassim’s is of course instructive, and for this reason i think Nassim has chosen Bob as the archetype of the standard model proponent, and there are many. However Bob represents more than that: he represents our basic insecurity with uncertainty, our occluded vision of infinity, our limited capacity to apprehend the space of which and in which we “exist.”
This exposition of the state of the frontiers of science and physics in particular is what a reasonable person should expect. The question should be, “if i cannot comprehend, how can another ?” .
The metaphysical nature of this question is what eludes most scientists who eschew philosophy. Science is derived from philosophy, and within philosophy is any manner of myth, mysticism and incompatible views and opinions.
The deplorable, but quite logical ad hominem approach to discourse, debate and discussion has a long, long history. From Pythagoras to many unknown crucial scientists in the development of fact and theory, many have suffered the ad hominem, even physically being put to death. It changes little, except the channel through which insight and progress may be made. However it does illustrate a basic biological pattern that with symbiosis we have a subservient antibiosis, engendering dominance and stability. It is seemingly unavoidable.
The progression of the work Nassim is engaging in is but one of the many attempts to rework the conception of experiential continuum that we all have subjectively, which i follow with deep interest. The Schwarzschild manifesto is an excellent introduction into the mysterious world of subjective reality.
” IN NASSIM WE TRUST” (put it on the dollar bill…)
The last video titled “Black Whole” and your new revolutionary idea of the Schwarzchild proton inspired me to think about the nature of the back holes
and the method by which they get created in the Cosmos.
I am not a scientist by profession, but rather an enthusiast when it comes to such topics. As such, my commentary may come across as somewhat naïve.
But, I would never forgive myself, if I did not share my opinion on this subject with you and others, and maybe get some positive response to it.
Right now, we know that when a large star is “dying”, it explodes and its inner core is converted into a black hole.
But what happens at the atomic level is still largely unexplained and misunderstood. So here goes my version of these events.
At the moment of the explosion, in every single atom, the negatively charged electron(s) are pushed into the center of the atom to the point where they merge with the positively charged proton(s).
This action annihilates both of them and only the mini-black hole remains.
As you have described in you recent paper, inside each proton is a mini-black hole.
All of the mini-black holes left over from the billions and billions of atoms comprising such core merge together, resulting in a one large black hole.
Thinking about it in a different term, the space between electrons and protons is “squeezed out” from every atom in the core (after electrons and protons cancel out each other), leaving only the mini-black holes in the center.
If this process is correct, then the event of the light being absorbed by the black hole makes sense.
It happens, because photons do not find any barrier from which to “bounced off” and the vacuum is absorbing such photons.
This would confirm your findings of a “black-hole” absorbing info (light) from many sources, modifying it and subsequently feeding a “white-hole” with such information back to our universe.
Your commentary of this entire process would be highly appreciated and I hope that I am not entirely “out to lunch” on it.
with regards,
Richard K.
As a student and teacher of Tai Chi Chi Kung and Taoist philosophy for 40 years, I beg to add to the mix of all the intelligent questions and responses. The chinese have a term for the Unknown Black Hole of Nothingness, it is called Wu Chi. I believe we can best understand it when we apply it to our own daily living. For example, watch what happens next time you are at a boring party, and you attempt to avoid the “void”, the emotional black hole. If you are able to hold the tension and not avoid the void, you may be able to GO into the void, the emotional black hole some people without judging that inner black hole as negative (loneliness) or positive (solitude), you come out “the other end”, the white hole!! And you feel creative, afresh, new and energised, the birth of a new inner universe!! Have a WOW time!!!
To Richard Karamon,
You are far from out to lunch. I really like the way you explained it. Could you clarify the part where you said the space is squeezed out, leaving only black holes at the center. Is is not true that photons are there as well?
Thanks,
Dana
To Whom It May Concern @ RP.org
I have an ituitive understanding of vortex torsion. I would like to address the speed of light. It must vary because in order for light to manifest an electron must shed energy. Therefore light is pulsing at trillions of cps (time forward, time reverse). Equally right spin, left spin. In other words the atomic torsion ring is wave transition at least 2x2x386,000mps. What would be the fourier transform to come up with an answer to the varible speed of light. Sorry I’m no mathematician. In other words…….How fast is the universe breathing, or refreshing, and does it matter after all?