The Resonance Project and Nassim Haramein are pleased to announce that Haramein’s latest paper, The Schwarzschild Proton, has passed peer review and is now published at the American Institute of Physics. The link on their site is here, http://scitation.aip.org/proceedings/confproceed/1303.jsp, where you may click on the right hand corner to see the table of contents PDF of the book. The Schwarzschild Proton is on page 95.
The published version of the paper is now available on our research page here: http://theresonanceproject.org/research/scientific. It contains important data and references that were not present in the draft version.
Note that the Schwarzschild Proton paper has already been cited by other scientists. In this case, Dr. John J. Kineman of the University of Colorado, and is published in the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS) http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings54th/article/viewFile/1498/511.
Hi Nassim,Your input with Brian O’Leary and William Tiller on “Crossing the Bridge” program was an excellent resummation and update of emerging themes long in process.Your New Spin on Einstein’s Field Equations and the Universal Scaling Law for Organized Matter are a refreshing re-awakening to the idling standard Physic’s model and the lackluster systems approach to scale invariance noted within the fractals/chaos to order and holographic tendencies.As I had recently emailed Brian O’Leary, the bridge was crossed back in the late 40′s. (the Tiller-Einstein model mentioned on my web page comes close, but for the vector directional sign)One final mathematical step, quantifying the radius of curvature of natural law has to be addressed.Quantifying the radius of the sine wave reflected in the ageless icon (the Yin Yang Symbol) handed down to us, and redefining broader concepts and relationships of space, time, mass, matter, energy, fields, and we too, will find the Bridge is already crossed over.The Quantity C is the Radius of Curvature of All Natural law.http://radiusofcurvature.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/the-quantity-c-is-the-radius-of-curvature-of-all-natural-lawSince the 1940′s, new energy technologies have been available through the actual testing of Einstein’s incomplete but testable portions of his 1928 Unified Field theory.StarSteps further expands and clarifies Einstein’s Unified Field Theory with the concept of the Radius Of Curvature Of All Natural Law. This did not change any of our mathematics, but dramatically changed the Interpretations contemporary science gave to Space, Time, Mass, Matter, Energy and Gravity – changed these factors to utter simplicity with extra ordinary application capacities.• In short, the quantity C is the measure of the radius of curvature of natural law. It is the factor which will enable us to determine precisely the degree of change in the curvature of one law which will be brought about by a specified change in the application of the others. It is the factor which will eventually tell us how to place our transport vehicles in either the positive or negative portion of the gravitational curve with respect to the earth or any other planet which we may choose to visit.• When we state that the quantity C is the radius of the curvature of natural law, we mean simply that if a differential of energy equal to this quantity exists between the observer and the point which he is observing, the natural laws will be suspended. If the energy differential is in excess of the quantity C, the laws will appear to operate in reverse at that point.…..continued on wordpress and Freedom Times blogshttp://radiusofcurvature.wordpress.com/2011/01/09/the-quantity-c-is-the-radius-of-curvature-of-all-natural-lawhttp://freedomtimes.blogspot.com/2010/12/response-to-planet-forward-question.html
Sorry, my “website” link is http://wwww.fuel2000.net ,(not .com). I missed the computer auto complete error in my previous reply link.
Fusion at its grandiose scale
Could a black hole’s singularity be so dense that nothing really enters but if contact is made it separates the -/+ particles as well as creating dark matter/dark energy? Which, might explain our expanding universe (e.g. if all of the negative particles showed up like (- – + – + – - + – to infinity). Could this be the reason it would be too dense to actually swallow anything but, instead create the space around us? I would also guess that if the world’s largest hadron collider actually gets turned on & does what is supposed to do, it might create a black hole that would not suck us in but would however be too heavy for our space. Then, it would basically just rip us apart by its massive density like an impenetrable piece of matter expanding from within. The reason that the expansion of the black hole doesn’t envelope everything is that the space it creates stops it from doing so. For example, if somebody tried to hold up an anvil with a sheet of paper it would most certainly break through the paper. As for this anvil it is infinitely dense so it would continue to swell & create the matter around it. I also think that’s why when a supernova happens a black hole is created; to help in the creation of new stars as well as the space for those stars and that is the reason the positive always outweighs the negatives.
Additional Details
*I am saying that upon the primal stages of the black hole’s birth it grabs the closest objects to them thereby destroying them in the process. Now at some point after this it will cease its negative gravitational pull on the surrounding objects at this point in time start in the creation of dark matter/ dark energy = positive. I am definitely not counting out the big bang theory in anyway with this thought.
*This is only a theoretical question for open minded individuals.
“Let the future tell the truth, and evaluate each one according to his work and accomplishments. The present is theirs; the future, for which I have really worked, is mine.”- Nikola Tesla
Consciousness seems to be non local, and only when it is compelled to become local does it then become filtered — encumbered by the very perception such a locality compels. If as the Ancients, say there is only ONE LIFE then the only reality is that Unity without separation is the truth and locality is gift of experiencing a moment of fractal unity. The personality will not perceive the Unity with emotional sets currently in wide circulation and will thus only experience the separate fractal — and all its accompanying perceptions and rules. Once the Unity is achieved — and there is no 2nd (only one) the non locality becomes to be experienced and all the rules change accordingly — an entirely new book of perceptions or rules can be written. The bridge between bringing a person enveloped a separation fractal to a Unity Reality cannot be facilitated by information alone. The resonance factor is then applied (think person across the River with a bull horn yelling how cool it is on the other side) and everything a Resona_tor (reason radiator) does, writes, says will appear as abstraction to one still hooked into the separate fractal — and it will come against a commercial paradigm — just sayin’… Very much enjoying your de normalizing information Nassim!
Another form of re normalization is killing out the dipole (see lee and yang nobel prize 1957) http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1957/) in all modern electrical circuits — that is — grounding out the Radiant Energy component. Killing the dipole — Maxwellian dumbing down of theory which becomes perpetuated that has been in school books since the late 1800′s. Excellent info on this by Lt Col. Tom Bearden.
http://www.cheniere.org/books/aids/ch4.htm
Great work Nassim! Aloha!
“I am not a body, I am not a mind, I am not a thought… I AM that ONE LIFE”
Does the toroidal blackhole field explain the uniform speed of solar systems around the centre of the galaxy?
Would a 500 year time shift be possible, like Jung experienced at Ravenna?
What other implications are there if the speed of light is not limiting?
Does the CIA PsiOps RVChronos Project confirm the methodology?
These are amazing times. I want to express my profound thank you for your work, and for making all this marvelous information available to us. As a life long artist and seeker, it is tremendously exciting to see how science and spirituality, finally! are coming together to make sense to our reality, from every angle we may look at it.
Your vision and words, Nassim, are especially meaningful to me, because having been everything a student in the “old school model” should not be, synesthetic, “dislexic”, “add”, “creative and intuitive”, it is tremendously libertating to know I was not that far off as I thought I was!
The infinitely magnificent reality is, that am fully in synchronicity with what you are bringing forth today, and can humbly say, I understand so much more now!
infinitely grateful!
Zen
Well, I just watched this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy9gXKwRpXc&feature=share, and they start to sound a lot like Nassim, even Susskind! Can you imagine?!
Simply Amazing! Congratulations from all my heart on your succesful Peer review! Thank you for your research and ability to communicate it to us in a way that is absolutely fantastic!
) I directly experience the changes in my views on ALL issues in my life because of your work since you have (from my viewpoint) removed the need for esoteric elements (not that I disregard those) but science is – for me – just so much more effective in getting rid of my old “counter-productive” belief-systems 
)
Your work in most likely some of the most important up untill now in human history and your timing is pretty great
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!!
Namaste
Martin from Denmark.
I am quoting a text I sent immediately after watching the Black Whole:
“I am totally gobsmacked! I came straight home and sat through the Nassim H video. Am now totally speechless. I have never seen or heard anything like this. He has mapped out the away it is in its totality. Oh My God – the man’s a genius. I keep finding myself saying ‘yes’, ‘yes’, ‘of course’ and when he started mapping it against the ancient traditions, well my brain went into overload.Suddenly, life is never the same again, and I really mean that. Awesome, awesome, awesome – I almost don’t know what to say or do next!”
This will take some assimilating – thank you Nassim H.
Pingback: Physicist Nassim Haramein Speaks About Consciousness | Meditation Science
Our world is described as infinitely big and the atomic universe is infinitely small. But just what is infinitely big and small in truly mathematical terms?
I love what going on here and Im with you guys on all this! but what i want to know is at what place on the earth do i need to be standing on dec 21 2012 I know there is a mathmatical answer and its tied in to that lat and long of the earth! As if to say there are 2 spiritual poles of the earth! And if you belive you will be saved! thanks again an im a big fan
if a proton is a mini black hole then why do the larger black holes that we see in space pair up to make a bigger black hole! wouldent a proton act the same way! im trying to spred the word about your protons but i need to know the answer so people will believe me!
I now say “It’s just dot simple” when trying to explain something to someone. Also, I am once again having what I call “LS-crazy” flashbacks. Good ones though. I must meditate more; my brain hurts and it won’t be quiet. Thanks a lot, Nassim! HA!
@Schnookdaddy I am no physicist, but i do have great comprehension skills. From what I got from Nassim’s explanation, I think that the reason that we don’t see larger black holes is because of the order of scaling that he talks about. For instance, if space (inside and outside space) is comprised of sub-protonic black holes, then the large black holes we are seeing at the center of galaxies would only be like the hole in the inside of a gigantic proton, thus the next order of size up would be a mega-massive black hole at the center of the universe. I’m pretty sure we haven’t been able to see anything like that with our current technology.
Also, from what I understood… this perfectly balanced shape that nassim found represents the equilibrium caused by the structure of space itself. Also, you must explain to people that black holes don’t function exactly like we have been taught to think (in movies and in older science books)… they don’t just suck things into the singularity, but actually spit out new stars, new matter… they create as well. That for me was a big breakthrough right there.
Dear Nassim,
I am not a scientist, I am an artist. For the longest time I have been searching for a way to learn how to draw, explore, and investigate sacred geometry in a deeper way. This morning I asked the universe to lead me to a teacher. Later I found myself watching a Barbara Hand Clow video and noticed a link to one of your videos — Sacred Geometry and Unified Fields. As I listened to your talk, I immediately realized that my request was answered. But I cannot afford to purchase all your DVDs nor do I know if they contain the info I need to learn from an artist’s perspective. Can you send me some advice?
Thank you,
Susan in Maine